Of twelve (12) Directors, eight (8) members (67%) are highly independent External Directors who meet
the “Criteria for Independence of External Directors” of the Company. Furthermore, of the four (4) internal
Directors, two (2) are Directors responsible for business execution and concurrently serve as Corporate Executive
Officers, and two (2) are non-executive Directors.
The total number of non-executive Directors, both internal
and external, is ten (10)(83%).
Additionally, to enhance the objectivity and transparency of oversight and the
separation of business execution from oversight, the Chairman of the Board of Directors is an Independent External
Director.
| Title | Name | Board of Directors | Nominating Committee | Compensation Committee | Audit Committee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | Kentaro Fujiwara | 〇 | |||
| Director | Ayako Hirofuji | 〇 | |||
| Director (Non-executive) |
Hiromi Anno | 〇 | 〇(Full-time) | ||
| Director (Non-executive) |
Hitoshi Okamoto | 〇 | 〇(Full-time) | ||
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Mariko Tokuno | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | |
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Yoshihiko Hatanaka | ◎ | ◎ | 〇 | |
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Yasuko Gotoh | 〇 | ◎ | ||
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Ritsuko Nonomiya | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | |
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Yasuhiro Nakajima | 〇 | 〇 | ||
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Andrew House | 〇 | 〇 | 〇 | |
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Keiko Kaneko | 〇 | 〇 | ||
| Independent External Director (Non-executive) |
Takuya Nakata | 〇 | 〇 | ◎ |
Notes:
1)Committee members are marked with 〇, and the chairperson of the Board of Directors and that of the committees are marked with ◎.
2)Click here to view the biographies of each Director.
Main topics of the Board of Directors in fiscal year 2025 are as follows:
The Company conducts an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board of Directors to identify issues and areas for improvement and evolve into a more effective board. Based on the findings of the effectiveness evaluation, we are working diligently to strengthen the Board's functions and improve its effectiveness through the following PDCA cycle.
Evaluation Process
The Company conducts annual questionnaires and interviews with all Directors to evaluate and analyze the
effectiveness of the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Compensation Committees. The Secretariat of the
Board of Directors compiles and analyzes the results and identifies key issues. The identified issues and
opinions are reported to the Board of Directors, which determines appropriate actions and implements necessary
measures.
To ensure transparency and objectivity, the Company commissions a third-party organization to
conduct an independent review and evaluation approximately once every three years.
In fiscal year 2025, the
Company engaged a third-party organization to prepare the questionnaire and oversee the evaluation process.
Based on the aggregated results compiled by the organization, the Company analyzed the findings and formulated
key initiatives for fiscal year 2026.
Initiatives During FY2025, Evaluation Findings, and Future Plans
In fiscal year 2025, the Company conducted an effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors covering the period from January to December (until fiscal year 2024, the evaluation period had run from the conclusion of the previous year’s Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders to the commencement of the current year’s Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders).Below, the Company outlines the key evaluation criteria and findings regarding initiatives undertaken during the evaluation period. Based on these findings and the issues identified, the Company will implement the following measures in fiscal year 2026 to further accelerate and enhance the effectiveness of the Board of Directors.
Related Information:
ABOUT US
BRANDS
SUSTAINABILITY
INNOVATION
INVESTORS